Skip to main content

School of Law — One of Three PCLL Providers and a Stronghold of Chinese Law

Academics ~10,393 characters · 22 min read Updated

Module: 01 Academics · Sub-file: School of Law and PCLL In Hong Kong, only three institutions can legally award the qualification that serves as the "licence to practise." The School of Law at City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK) is one of them — and this status is the school's strongest calling card. This entry draws on public sources to outline its history, dual-degree tracks, PCLL threshold, Chinese law tradition, and international competition record; for a faculty-wide overview, see colleges-and-schools.md.


I. History: From Department of Law to School of Law

According to a public overview, the School of Law's development can be divided into several stages:

Year Milestone
1987 Department of Law established; Hong Kong's second law school
1992 Department of Professional Legal Education established
March 1993 The two departments merged to form the Faculty of Law
1998 Renamed School of Law

The school's core mission is to support and enhance legal education and training in Hong Kong, achieved through teaching, research, international publication, and specialist programmes. That CityU established a law department during its early years as a polytechnic-turned-university shows it incorporated legal education into its blueprint for serving Hong Kong's professional manpower needs from a very early stage.


Understanding the weight the School of Law carries requires first understanding the qualification pathway for legal practice in Hong Kong.

The PCLL is a one-year full-time programme covering civil litigation, criminal litigation, commercial practice, conveyancing, legal accounts, and professional conduct, among other areas. Its core components include: Interlocutory Advocacy and Interviewing, Trial Advocacy, Mediation and Negotiation, Conveyancing Practice, Wills and Probate, Corporate and Commercial Practice, Civil Litigation Practice, Criminal Litigation Practice, and Professional Conduct and Practice (CityU PCLL page).

To enrol in CityU's PCLL, a candidate must hold an LLB or JD degree from a local university, or an equivalent qualification from a recognised institution in a common law jurisdiction (CityU PCLL page).


III. Degree Programmes: LLB / JD Dual Track / PCLL / LLM

Hong Kong's law degrees operate on a dual-track system: the LLB (Bachelor of Laws, undergraduate route) and the JD (Juris Doctor, postgraduate route) run in parallel, both feeding into the PCLL and professional practice (StudyIn.HK).

Programme Description
LLB (Bachelor of Laws) The school's flagship undergraduate programme; four years full-time
JD (Juris Doctor) A postgraduate-entry professional degree; CityU was the first law school in Hong Kong to launch a JD, completed in 2–3 years full-time
PCLL (Postgraduate Certificate in Laws) The professional practice qualification; CityU is one of three PCLL providers
LLM (Master of Laws) Taught master's degree, with several specialist streams
Research degrees MPhil, PhD, etc.

According to public information, CityU admits roughly 60–80 JD students each year, and the average undergraduate result among admitted JD candidates is upper second-class honours or above.


IV. Distinctive Character: A Deep Tradition in Chinese Law and Comparative Law

The most distinctive academic feature of the CityU School of Law is its tradition in PRC Law and comparative law. According to a public overview, the school requires undergraduates to take three foundational courses in Chinese law:

  • Legal System of the PRC
  • Public Law of the PRC
  • Private Law of the PRC

Research priorities include: Chinese law and comparative law, the Chinese constitution and the Hong Kong Basic Law, cross-border legal issues between Hong Kong and mainland China, Chinese foreign investment and trade law, and arbitration and alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

This positioning fits neatly with Hong Kong's role as the "common law bridge between mainland China and the world" — legal professionals who understand both common law and Chinese law are precisely the scarce resource the Greater Bay Area era demands.


V. International Mooting and Arbitration Results

Mooting is a key yardstick for measuring the quality of a law school's practical training. According to a public overview, the CityU School of Law has posted strong results in numerous international competitions:

More pioneering still, in 2010, the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), the CityU School of Law, and Columbia Law School jointly launched an innovative competition that combined both arbitration and mediation practice to handle a simulated case — placing CityU at the forefront of Sino-American legal education exchange and dispute-resolution innovation.


VI. Academic Reputation

The CityU School of Law ranks highly in international law-subject rankings. According to the law subject rankings published by organisations such as Times Higher Education, Law is one of CityU's ranked subjects (THE — School of Law page). The school publishes academic journals including the City University of Hong Kong Law Review.


VII. Relationship to CityU's Overall Positioning

  • The chokepoint status vs. young-institution image. Though young, CityU, by virtue of its PCLL authorisation and Chinese law tradition, holds an irreplaceable position in legal education — another illustration of the "small but sharp, targeting the critical" strategy that CityU applies in professional fields.
  • The bridge role. The combination of common law + Chinese law + arbitration/ADR makes the School of Law a natural fit for Hong Kong's positioning as a "super-connector," and aligns with CityU's broader internationalisation and Greater Bay Area strategy.

VIII. Summary


Sources

Cross-references

Notes on the consolidation of this entry

Consolidation principle: verifiable facts, sources, and cross-reference clues from the original cards are preserved; repeated definitions are retained only once; thematic relationships are explained using the parent-card structure, without breaking adjacent sub-topics into multiple thin cards again.

Criteria for subsequent updates

This entry was consolidated from several short cards in the old module. Subsequent updates will only enter the main text based on three categories of material: first, primary sources such as the university's official website, annual reports, faculty web pages, and publications from regulatory or ranking bodies; second, verifiable facts from reliable media, student media, or public archives; third, public timelines that can explain institutional changes. Isolated screenshots, undated hearsay, ranking slogans or personal assessments whose sources cannot be traced may only serve as leads to be verified and must not be written directly as fact.

Structurally, this entry functions as a parent card: it gives the reader a complete framework first, then retains the details, sources, and cross-references of the old cards. If a single topic subsequently expands beyond 12,000 words, it will then be split into two parts; if only a year, an institution, or a controversy is added, it should continue to be incorporated into this entry to avoid creating thin cards again.

Sources · verify independently